Assessment2
Marking criteria and standards: Assessment2 – Guided Essay- Promoting mental health and wellbeing
Criteria Mark High Distinction
Distinction Credit Pass Fail
1 – lnv estigate and outline the
prevalence/incidence of Depression or
ostnatal Depression (depending on
the
scenario you have chosen) in Australia
using current literature
10
The details related to the
prevalence/incidence
of
Depression/PND is
exceptional and ofthe
highest quality. The answer
is well supported by
relevant literature
The details related
to the
Brevalence/incidence of
epression/PND is
accurate and of superior.
The answer is supported
by relevant literature
The details
related to the
prevalence/incidence of
Depression/PND are
effective. The answer is
supported by good quality
evidence from
literature.
The details related to the
prevalence/incidence of
Depression/PND are
adequate. The answer is
supported adequately
though
minimally by
relevant literature. Some
lack of conciseness, clarity
and focusto details
provided.
The details related to
the
prevalence/incidence of
Depression/PND are
lnadequate.
Sources used are not
adequate to support the
work. Explanations are
brief
and lack depth.
6.5-10 7.5-8 6.5-7.0 5-6 54.5
2 – Discuss using current literature TWO
(2) factorsthat may have contributed to
the
development of either Sally or
Marie’s mental illnesses.
10
Discussion consistently
conveys evidence of
analysis and
synthesis
showing exceptional
understanding ofthe
factors that may have
contributed to Sally or
Marie’s mental illnesses.
Sources
used are
exceptional to support
work. Exceptional critical
discussion noted.
Discussion consistently
conveys evidence of
critical
analysis and shows
superior understanding of
the factorsthat may have
contributed to Sally or
Marie’s mental
illnesses;
Sources used are accurate
and superiorto support
work. Superior critical
discussion noted.
Discussion provides a
degree of
analysis showing
an effective understanding
ofthe factorsthat may
hav e contributed to Sally or
Marie’s mental illnesses.
Sources
used are effective
to support work. Effective
critical discussion noted.
Discussion supports an
adequate description of
factors that
may have
contributed to Sally or
Marie’s mental illnesses.
Sources used are
adequate to support work.
Minimal critical
discussion
noted.
Discussion is inadequate to
identify factors that may
hav e contributed to Sally or
Marie’s mental
illnesses.
Sources used are not
adequate to support work.
Discussions are brief and
lack depth. Little or no
critical discussion
noted.
6.5-10 7.5-8 6.5-7.0 5-6 54.5
3 – Discuss using current literature TWO
(2) ethico-legal issues related to your
chosen
scenario
10
Exceptional discussion
related to the ethico-legal
issues related to the
scenario. Sources used are
exceptional to
support
work. Exceptional critical
discussion noted.
Superior discussion of the
ethico-legal issues related
to the scenario.
Superior
critical analysis and
discussion noted. Sources
used are of high standard
Effective discussion ofthe
ethico-legal issues
related to
scenario. Sources used are
effective to support work.
Effective critical discussion
noted
Adequately discusses
the
ethico-legal issues related
to scenario. Sources used
are adequate to support
work. Minimal critical
discussion noted
Work does
not adequately
or clearly discuss ethicolegal
issues related to the
scenario. Little or no critical
discussion noted. Sources
used are
not adequate to
support work.
6.5-10 7.5-8 6.5-7.0 5-6 54.5
Page 15 of 26
Criteria Mark High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass
Fail
4 – ldentify TWO (2) nursing/midwifery
problems/risks with evidence from your
chosen scenario
Exceptional identification
of
TWO (2) nursing/midwifery
problems/risks with clear
evidence and relevance to
the case study chosen.
Superior identification of
TWO
(2) nursing/midwifery
problems/risks with clear
evidence and relevance to
the case study chosen.
Effective identification of
TWO (2)
nursing/midwifery
problems/risks with clear
evidence and relevance to
the scenario chosen.
Ade uate identification of
TWO (2)
nursing/midwifery
problems/risks with minimal
evidence and relevance to
the scenario chosen. Lack
of clarity
lnadequate identification
of
pro bl_e ms/r_isk_s.
ursing/midwifery
problems/risks do not
relate to the scenario
chosen.
4.5-5 4 3.5 2.5-3 S2
5 – For each
nursing/midwifery
problem/riskoyou have identified in
Question 4, utline and describe TWO
(2) evidenced based
nursing/midwifery
iāq1toerventions and rationales for each
Exceptional; clear
concisely written
relevant
nursing/midwifery
interventions. Sources
used are exceptional to
support work. Exceptional
critical descriptions
noted.
Superior; well written
relevant nursing/midwifery
interventions.
Superior descriptions
noted. Sources used are of
high
standard
Effective explanation of
relevant evidenced based
nursing/midwifery
interventions.
Effective descriptions
noted. Sources used
are
effective to support work.
Adequate
nursing/midwifery
evidenced based
interventions; some lack of
focusto problems
identified
Adequate descriptions
noted. Sources used are
adequate to support work.
lnadequate or
inappropriate evidenced
based
nursing/midwifery
interventions. Interventions
do not relate to the
identified scenario.
Sources used are not
adequate to support
work.
6.5-10 7.5-8 6.5-7.0 5-6 54.5
Academic writing 8. referencing skills
Exceptional referencing:
both in text and
final
reference list according to
APA style. Extensive,
relevant current academic
reference list effectively
utilised.
Publishable
writing style
and use of language
Superior referencing, with
adequate and correct in
text and final reference list
according to APA
style.
Com preh ensive, relev ant,
list of current academic
references used.
Superiorwriting style and
use of language; no errors
in
spelling, grammar, or
Epnctuation.
fective referencing.
Minimal referencing errors,
following APA style in both
in text and final
reference
list.
Effective writing style and
use of language; minimal
errors in spelling, grammar,
or punctuation.
Adequate
referencing.
Some referencing APA
style errors in text and/or in
final reference list
Adequate, basic writing
style and use of
language;
minor errors in spelling,
grammar, or punctuation.
lnadequate referencing,
both in text and final list
that do not meet APA
style.
lnadequate writing style
and use of language, errors
in spelling, grammar, or
punctuation that impede
meanin
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT š
3