102. Bibliography of Sustainability Crisis
Dannreuther, R. and Ostrowski, W. (2015) Global Resources: Conflict and Cooperation. Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan
Freedman, M. and Jaggi, B. (2013) Sustainability, Environmental Performance and Disclosures. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing
Kanninen, T. (2016) Crisis of Global Sustainability. London: Routledge
Purvis, M. and Grainger, A. (2016) Exploring Sustainable Development: Geographical Perspectives. London: Routledge
Roosa, S. (2015) Sustainable Development Handbook. Lilburn: The Fairmont Press, Inc.
with these include:
A performance at this level largely achieves all of the following:
? There is a brief introduction which clearly specifies the focus of the bibliography with in-text references as required.
? At least five annotations are based on key academic sources from the field, from books, journals and the internet.
? The sources selected all relate clearly to the purpose specified in the introduction.
? The sources are cited accurately with full references in correct order above each annotation.
? Each annotation outlines key points from the source and explains how these will be used in the essay.
? There is evidence of critical evaluation or comparison of the sources and the writer’s viewpoint is clearly shown.
? The annotations are in the writer’s own words and the language is free from basic errors.
A performance at this level largely achieves all of the following:
? There is a brief introduction which indicates the focus of the bibliography with in-text references as required.
? At least five annotations are based on academic sources from books, journals and the internet.
? The sources selected all relate to the purpose specified in the introduction.
? The sources are mainly cited accurately with full references in correct order above each annotation.
? Each annotation summarises ideas from the source and attempts to explain how these will be used in the essay.
? There is some evidence of comparison of the sources and the writer’s viewpoint is indicated.
? The annotations are mainly in the writer’s own words and the language is largely free from basic errors.
A performance at this level is marked by one or more of the following:
? The introduction is weak or too brief and the focus is unclear or absent. There are no in-text references.
? There may be less than five sources and these have been selected mainly from the internet.
? The sources selected do not all relate to a focus or purpose specified in the introduction.
? There are inaccuracies in citation: references are not listed in full or not in correct order above each annotation.
? Ideas are summarised but may not relate to the essay with no attempt to explain how the source will be used.
? There is no evaluation or comparison of the sources and no indication of the writer’s viewpoint.
? Parts of the annotation may be plagiarised and those parts in the writer’s own words contain many basic errors.
A performance at this level is seriously flawed by one or more of the following weaknesses:
? There is no introduction so the topic is unclear.
? Less than five sources have been selected and many of these are from inappropriate websites.
? The sources selected seem unrelated to each other or to a focused topic.
? There are many inaccuracies in the listing and ordering of references.
? The summaries consist of general opinions with no indication of how the sources will be used in the essay
? The annotations are clearly plagiarized from sources or the writing contains many errors so meaning is obscured.