Histology and the integumentary system

 

Read the following questions and briefly describe your thoughts on the answer and how you come to that answer. This activity is intended

to allow you to think about what you have learned and how you can apply it to problems or situations in the real world.

Critical Thinking Reflection: Module 3

Compare and contrast the characteristics of the ideal tissue forming the outer surface of the body with that forming the lining of the

small intestine. How are they similar and different? What tissues fulfill these needs?
If a bone is broken, it will heal in several months. If cartilage is broken, it generally never heals. If epithelium is cut, it heals in a

week or so. Why is there such a difference in the healing rates of these tissues?
This assignment will be graded using the rubric displayed below. Please review this rubric prior to beginning your work. You can also

access the rubric by clicking on Critical Thinking Reflection on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. This journal is

part of your overall Critical Thinking Reflection grade worth 10%

By completing this reflection activity you will meet module outcomes: #1 & 4.

Rubric
HSC105 & HSC106 Critical Thinking Reflection Rubric
HSC105 & HSC106 Critical Thinking Reflection Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relevance & Depth
60.0 pts
A: Provides a clear and comprehensive reflection to the assigned question(s) that demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the

topic/concepts.
51.0 pts
B: Provides a reflection for the assigned question(s) that demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the topic/concepts. Some minor

READ ALSO :   essay

details may be missing.
45.0 pts
C: Provides a brief reflection for the assigned question(s); however, some areas are incomplete and reflection needs more detail to

demonstrate full understanding of the topic/concepts. May be some minor inaccuracies or misconceptions with content.
39.0 pts
D: Attempt at reflection addresses at least some of the questions; however, important details are vague or missing. Response demonstrates

little understanding of the topic/concepts and may indicate there are some misconceptions with the content.
33.0 pts
F: Attempt at reflection addresses at least a few questions; however, answers are incomplete and/or contain major inaccuracies. Reader

cannot ascertain the points the student is making.
0.0 pts
0: No reflection paper provided.
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization
25.0 pts
A: Writing is organized and skillfully communicates meaning to readers (e.g., clear focus, appropriate word choice, language flows

seamlessly); all components of the assignment are addressed. Student clearly and consistently differentiates his/her thoughts from those

of others (e.g., textbook) at all times by citing where appropriate.
21.0 pts
B: Writing is organized and generally conveys meaning to readers; all components of the assignment are addressed. In general, student

clearly and consistently differentiates his/her thoughts from those of others (e.g., textbook) by citing where appropriate.
19.0 pts
C: Writing is somewhat organized and generally conveys meaning to readers; most components of the assignment are addressed. In general,

student clearly and consistently differentiates his/her thoughts from those of others (e.g., textbook) by citing where appropriate.
16.0 pts
D: Writing attempts organization, but writing language errors or organization errors sometimes interferes with the meaning. Some

READ ALSO :   BUSINESS AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION MOD 1 SLP

components of the assignment/questions may be missing. AND/OR Student does not clearly differentiate his/her thoughts from those of others

in several places.
14.0 pts
F: Written work does not progress logically and ideas are not fully formed; most of the components of the assignment/questions are

missing. AND/OR Student does not differentiate his/her thoughts from those of others.
0.0 pts
0: No reflection paper provided.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Syntax & Mechanics
15.0 pts
A: Clearly and consistently uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
13.0 pts
B: Uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are a few minor errors; however, they do not interfere with meaning.
12.0 pts
C: Generally uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are a few errors that interfere with meaning.
10.0 pts
D: There are many grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with meaning.
8.0 pts
F: The substantial number of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors make the paper difficult to read.
0.0 pts
0: No reflection paper provided.
15.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
Previous Next