Philosophy
1. In ”What Is It Like To Be A Bat?”, Thomas Nagel argues that we humans cannot know what it is like to be a bat [the animal, not the baseball implement], even though we can know a lot about the physical attributes of bats. Using just the first 4 paragraphs in the uploaded article, describe some of the important physical attributes of bats that Nagel mentions and tell why he thinks that we can’t know “what it is like to be” a bat.
A. Describe some of the important physical attributes of bats that Nagel mentions
B. Tell why he thinks that we can’t know “what it is like to be” a bat.
2. In your considered opinion, what is one strength or one weakness of Nagel’s main conclusion. Explain why you said what you did.
A. Underling one strength or one weakness of Nagel’s main conclusion In your considered opinion
B. Explain why you said what you did
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂