National Survey of Student Engagement, 2010 Results. Major Differences: Examining Student Engagement by Field of Study
Monograph Reviews: The objective is for you to identify:
What you learned from the monograph?
What are the major ideas that the report is attempting to communicate?
How well did the report communicate those ideas?
What changes in current practice (if any) does the report advocate for?
What are the reports flaws?
Do you agree with what this document concludes?
What ideas for additional inquiry are likely, based upon this report?
How is this report likely to influence your practice as a Higher Education professional now and in the future?
It is important you connect your report with the material covered in the texts, and draw out comparisons, analogies and
examples with a well-developed narrative. monograph review is to be a minimum of 1500 words in APA format. The monograph
reviews are to be double spaced, and include a title page, abstract, and bibliography.
Requesting a US Writer
References to be utilized
Diamond, R. (2002). Field Guide to Academic Leadership: A Publication of the National Academy for Academic Leadership.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
Bastedo, M. (2012). The Organization of Higher Education: Managing Colleges for a New Era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Place this order with us and get 18% discount now! to earn your discount enter this code: special18 If you need assistance chat with us now by clicking the live chat button.