In your discussion comparing the film version and the “real” history, pay some attention to how the history of the
period, place, persons, etc. .is handled in the film – is there a significant time compression, are the events dramatized
greatly in comparison to the way they are portrayed in the written historical works, are they “distorted” for dramatic or
political reasons, are characters added or subtracted from the film version, etc.? You may wish to allude not only to the
actual history, characters, settings, periods, etc., but to the cinematic elements in the movie version– that is, the
way the story is narrated, the way it is filmed or edited )for example, what shots are used and how they are edited
together to create effects or emotional reactions), the way the actors are directed, the way color, music, lighting,
camera angles, or other elements are employed, and so forth. Finally, you should offer some opinion- and the reasons
behind it–as to whether the film version is “accurate” or not, and if not, why not.
An example — if you were to write about “Camila,” do some reading about Argentina in the period of the dictator Juan
Manuel de Rosas. You should not use any sources available online, except perhaps for things such as journal articles
downloaded from databases like J-Stor. This is primarily a library assignment, so go to the library. You should find AT
LEAST three sources — journal aritcles, books, chapters in multi-authored works, etc — relating to the historical peiod
of the film, read the sources, and discuss how the film version of the historical incident, personage, period,etc.,
relates to the actual history as written about in your sources.
Place this order with us and get 18% discount now! to earn your discount enter this code: special18 If you need assistance chat with us now by clicking the live chat button.