Analysis and Synthesis of Prior Research
Write three response papers one page each with its own citations. The first two are based on the attached writings and the third one is based on the order # ID 209229962 writings which you had covered earlier.
1. Analysis and Synthesis of Prior Research
Respond to the two attached document in one page each with its own reference page, posting with your own thoughts. At a minimum, be sure to include the following elements:
Assess the conceptualization, analysis, and synthesis of key research concepts presented by the writer
• Evaluate the extent to which the writer has addressed the elements from the Learning Outcomes from his references
• Does the presentation provide a cohesive summary of the assigned concepts with an effective evaluation of their implications for organizational leadership?
Did the writer provide a meaningful academic argument or interpretation that demonstrated fluency with the material?
• Incorporate at least 5 additional scholarly sources from a recognized database.
NOTE: Be sure to support your points with specific references to the reading using scholarly sources in your analysis from a recognized database in your posting. They should consist of peer-reviewed articles that have been published within the past 3-5 years. Remember when citing please make sure that the journal articles must have either a doi number or the journal homepage URL with proper APA formatting
2. In what ways do the readings you worked on my order ID 209229962 answer important “So what?” questions in the field of leadership and organizational change? How are these readings potentially valuable for research in the field?
• Are the model(s) or paradigm(s) primarily theoretical or applied? What are the implications of this for future research?
• What concepts of global and multicultural leadership do you perceive to be the weakest in the model(s) or paradigm(s) presented? Why? How could they be strengthened?
• To what extent do the model(s) or paradigm(s) present a clear set of measures for assessing leadership and determining group or organizational outcomes? What suggestions do you have for enhancing assessment metrics?
• Are there any important contradictions, arguments, disagreements, or divergences within this set of readings that point to potential areas for future research? How would you follow up to extend or explore these gaps?
• NOTE: Be sure to support your points with specific references to the reading using scholarly sources in your analysis from a recognized database in your posting. They should consist of peer-reviewed articles that have been published within the past 3-5 years. Remember when citing please make sure that the journal articles must have either a doi number or the journal homepage URL with proper APA formatting
5