Article Review

Undertake a critical review of the article using the format listed under Instructions for Authors for Australian Critical Care: 1- Start with a section called “Summary” This is the section where you would describe your chosen article, including a summary of the aims of the study, the setting, sample, methods, results and conclusion of the published study. (500 words) 2- The next heading will be “Critique”. This is where you would critique the article (Use CASP as a critical tool for Randomised Control Trial)… so do some research on the type of method they have used – what sort of measures of rigour apply to this method and how have they have fulfilled these measures of rigour? Are the findings and conclusions they have drawn reliable? You will need to then proceed to discuss this chosen article in relation to other articles that have investigated this topic. Does this article support findings in other similar studies or do the findings differ? If they differ, can you think of any explanation for this? You should finish your critique section with a conclusive statement –after looking at this article in the context of past research, what is the significance of the article’s findings and how do you think clinicians should use these findings in their clinical practice? (1000 words) Academic English should be written.