Module June 2017
Assessment
The evaluation of understanding of the course will consist of ONE written Assignments (see below) and a written examination.
Assignment:
Assignment due date: …….
Word Count: 3500
Criteria for Assessment
The following criteria will be applied in assessing your written work:
Evidence of understanding of the concepts, theories and ideas developed in the course;
Ability to apply these concepts to situations from your own experience;
Capability to structure an assignment logically and limit it to the length required;
The degree to which the material submitted for assessment addresses the specified assignment requirements.
CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
1. The role of Social Media in Aviation Crisis Management and Emergency Response Planning.
2. Critically Evaluate by referenced to case studies how Emergency Response planning implementation may impact airlines reputation and legitimacy following an aviation accident.
3. Provide a management report to the CAA regarding the effectiveness of the ERM response and implementation of the major state holders during the FZ591 and EK521 accidents.
Marking Scheme
Marking Scheme and Feedback Sheet
Student’s Name: …………………………………………………………….… Date: ………………..….
Key to marking scheme:
0 = no evidence of meeting criteria 10 = maximum adherence to criteria
Justification
Addresses the specific question(s) posed. Demonstrates clear understanding of topic(s) with good theoretical background.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Explains relevant concepts, principles, theories, case studies and provides practical examples where appropriate.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Critical Analysis / Evaluation
Presents an analysis and evaluation of the ideas and theories discussed. Critically reviews literature; contrast and compares relevant debates, concepts and theories.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Arguments illustrate critical analysis and evaluation with an internal integration and coherence.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Review of Supporting Evidence
Demonstrates adequate use of sources to gain further in-depth knowledge of the topic in question and the specific question(s) posed.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Justifies literature in relation to question(s); clearly links literature to objectives; incorporates current / recent literature
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Discussion and Conclusion
Synthesises the analysis of key principles and concepts and discusses and explores alternative outcomes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Provides a suitable conclusion in relation to the area(s) of discussion and the specific question(s; draws from analysis; provides rational alternative arguments / recommendations which are supported.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Effective Communication
Presents material in logical, fluent order; error free in respect to grammar, spelling, typographical errors.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Correct format with referencing and a complete, detailed bibliography
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Key strengths:
Main areas for improvement:
Final Mark: ………