CRITICAL APPRAISAL EESAYOF A GIVEN QUANTITATIVE ARTICLE

CRITICAL APPRAISAL EESAYOF A GIVEN QUANTITATIVE ARTICLE
Paper details

THE ESSAY WILL BE A CRITICAL APPRAISAL EESAY OF A GIVEN QUANTITATIVE ARTICLE WHICH IS ATTACHED DOWN TITLED FINAL QUANT ALONG WITH A QUAL GUIDELINES AND A RCT GUIDELINES TO BE USED IN THE APPRAISAL OF THE ARTICLE. THE CRIQUE SHOULD NOT BE GENERAL BUT BE SPECIFIC TO THE PAPER, I MEAN FOR EXAMPLE NOT TALKING ABOUT RCT IN GENERAL BUT SPECIFICALLY HOW IT WAS USED IN THE ARTICLE, IT SHOULD BE WRITTEN WITH HEADINGS FROM THE GUIDELINES. NO INTRODUCTION NEEDED JUST A ONE SHORT PARAGRAPH TITLED ABSTRACT TO TELL WHAT THE ABSTRACT OFFER ABOUT THE WHOLE ARTICLE. INTRODUCTION IS SAME THING AS BACKGROUND IN THE ARTICLE. THE ESSAY SHOULD NOT BE A DESCRIPTION OR SUMMARY BUT A CRITIQUE OF WHAT IS GOOD AND BAD ABOUT THE ARTICLE. GENERAL COMMENTS LIKE IF JUSTIFICATIONS FOR SOME DOINGS WERE PROVIDED AND SO, BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN GROUPS, APPROPRIATENESS MEASURE OF THE STUDY, COULD ANY METHOD BE BETTER OFF USED, HOW RANDOMISATION WAS DONE, WAS IT SUCCESSFUL OR BIASED?? CRITIQUE, WAS THERE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE USE COMPARATIVE GROUP INSTEAD OF PLACEBO? CRITIQUE, SAMPLE TOO BIG OR SMALL? REASONS GIVEN WHY IT WAS USED? HOW THEY GOT THE SAMPLE SIZE PROVIDED, IS IT GOOD OR NOT CRIQUE? RECRUITMENT WELL DONE OR NOT? INCLUSION EXCLUSION CRITERIA, WHY THEY USED IT? WELL JUSTIFIED? ENOUGH REASON GIVEN?PATIENT FLOW DIAGRAM DISCUSS? UNDER OUTCOME MEASURES: PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME DO THEY LINK BACK TO THE STUDY AIMS? DISCUSS THE EFFECTS OF THE P VALUES, CI OF THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES LARGE OR SMALL? INTERPRETED CORRECTLY?? TABLES WELL GENERATED? ANY PREVIOUS RESEARCH? DOING RCT GOOD OR BAD? HOW THEY DID IT CRIQUE? UNDER BACKGROUND: STUDY AIMS CLEAAR ENOUGH? DOES THE INTO BUILD ON IT AND THROUGHOUT THE PAPER?RESEARCH QUESTION EASY TO FIND, RELATE TO THE WHOLE PAPER, STUDY ADEQUATELY DESCRIBED? BPTH GROUPS WELL DESCRIBED? PROBLEM STATED? ALL I GAVE ARE JUST GENERAL COMMENTS EXPECTED. ALL THE STEPS TO BE DISCUSSED ARE IN THE GUIDELINE.NO PLAGIARISM PLEASE. SAW SAMPLES ON LINE TOO. YOU MAY LIKE TO GO THOUGH THEM. BUT I BELIEVE YOU CAN WRITE BETTER THAN THEM.