Explaining the Theories and Techniques of Psychological Measurement
In 2–6 pages, describe the following psychometric properties of the instrument you propose to use in your study:
1. The type and name of the instrument(s)
2. How the instrument is obtained (or developed)
3. How you obtained permission to use the instrument (if applicable)
4. Any acronyms used to refer to the instrument (if applicable)
5. The instruments author(s)
6. Key reference(s) for understanding the instrument
7. The purpose of the instrument(s) (i.e., what it will measure)
8. The rationale for your selection and development of the instrument(s)
9. The number of items to be examined
10. Any relevant subsets or subscales and their definitions
11. The response format (e.g., Likert, multiple choice, yes/no, open ended)
12. How the instrument is scored
13. The reliability of the instrument
14. The validity of the instrument
15. Any pilot studies previously performed
Sources will be at your choice, and between 2012-2017(5 years)
• EDL 892B: Week 1: Assignment 3: Procedures for Instrumentation
Explaining the Theories and Techniques of Psychological Measurement
In 2–6 pages, describe the following psychometric properties of the instrument you propose to use in your study:
1. The type and name of the instrument(s)
2. How the instrument is obtained (or developed)
3. How you obtained permission to use the instrument (if applicable)
4. Any acronyms used to refer to the instrument (if applicable)
5. The instruments author(s)
6. Key reference(s) for understanding the instrument
7. The purpose of the instrument(s) (i.e., what it will measure)
8. The rationale for your selection and development of the instrument(s)
9. The number of items to be examined
10. Any relevant subsets or subscales and their definitions
11. The response format (e.g., Likert, multiple choice, yes/no, open ended)
12. How the instrument is scored
13. The reliability of the instrument
14. The validity of the instrument
15. Any pilot studies previously performed
Assignment Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConceptual Understanding Has cogent analysis; shows command of interpretive and conceptual tasks required by assignment and course materials; original and insightful ideas, going beyond parroting ideas in the course
2.0 pts Shows a good understanding of the texts, ideas, and methods of the assignment; goes beyond the obvious; may have one minor factual or conceptual inconsistency
1.0 pts Shows inadequate command of course materials or has significant factual and conceptual errors; does not respond directly to the demands of the assignment; confuses some significant ideas
0.5 pts Shows lack of understanding lectures, readings, discussions, or assignment
0.0 pts
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Development and Substantiation Well-chosen examples; persuasive reasoning used to develop and support content; evident causal connections between ideas
2.0 pts Develops a main argument with clear major points and makes an effort to organize paragraphs topically
1.0 pts Frequently only narrates; digresses from one topic to another without developing ideas or terms
0.5 pts Little or no development; may list facts or include misinformation
0.0 pts
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications for Practice Demonstrates an integration of academic content, personal experience, and critical thought; effectively applies findings to current practice
2.0 pts Offers moderate application of findings to current practice and connection to personal experience
1.0 pts Application to current practice effectiveness is limited
0.5 pts Does not apply findings to current practice effectiveness
0.0 pts
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Language Uses sophisticated sentences effectively; observes conventions and makes few mechanical errors
2.0 pts Some mechanical difficulties or stylistic problems; occasional awkward syntax errors; few misspellings, punctuation errors, or clichés
1.0 pts Frequent wordiness; several unclear or awkward sentences; imprecise use of words or over- reliance on passive voice
0.5 pts Numerous grammatical errors and stylistic problems seriously distract from the argument
0.0 pts
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations & References All references and citations are correctly written and present; quotations and citations integrated effectively
2.0 pts One reference or citations missing or incorrectly written; appropriate textual evidence and supporting detail
1.0 pts Two references or citations missing or incorrectly written; insufficient or awkward use of textual evidence
0.5 pts Reference or citation errors detract from paper; uses no quotations, fails to cite sources, or plagiarizes
0.0 pts
2.0 pts
Total Points: 10.0