HIPAA concerns
PURPOSE
The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, peer-review status, study characteristics, conflict of interest, population, sampling, vulnerable subjects, and HIPAA concerns.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and 8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)
DUE DATE: Submit to the Reading Research Literature #1 basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
REQUIREMENTS
1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.
Retrieve the following research articles:
Sanford, J., Townsend-Rocchicciolli, J., Horigan, A., & Hall, P. (2011). A process of decision making by caregivers of family members with heart failure. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 25(1), 55–70. http://proxy.devry.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/853503862/354CEF3F10A4D9CPQ/6?accountid=147674
Schwarz, K. A., Mion, L. C., Hudock, D., & Litman, G. (2008). Telemonitoring of heart failure patients and their caregivers: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 23, 18–26. http://proxy.devry.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.devry.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2009875572&site=ehost-live
2. Download NR439_RRL1_form and type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your paper does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.
3. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_RRL1_Smith.docx.
4. Submit to the Reading Research Literature #1 basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5 Q & A Forum.
POINTS: This assignment is worth 225 points.
GRADING CRITERIA
Category Points % Description
Question 1 10 4% Identifies the purpose of the research article.
Question 2 10 4% Identifies the research question implied in the study.
Question 3 10 4% Describes the design of the study.
Question 4 10 4% Identifies characteristics of qualitative study.
Question 5 10 4% States peer review status.
Question 6 10 4% Describes any conflict of interest or financial gain.
Question 7 10 4% Identifies the population.
Question 8 10 4% Describes the sample.
Question 9 10 4% Identifies vulnerable subjects.
Question 10 10 5% Expresses HIPAA concerns.
Question 11 10 5% Identifies the purpose of the research article.
Question 12 10 5% Identifies the research question implied in the study.
Question 13 10 5% Describes the design of the study.
Question 14 10 5% Identifies characteristics of quantitative study.
Question 15 10 5% States peer review status.
Question 16 10 5% Describes any conflict of interest or financial gain.
Question 17 10 5% Identifies the population.
Question 18 10 5% Describes the sample.
Question 19 10 5% Identifies vulnerable subjects.
Question 20 10 5% Expresses HIPAA concerns.
Style and Writing 25 11% Names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
Total 225 points 100%
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment Criteria A
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance B
Very Good or High Level of Performance C
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance F
Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Total Points
Question 1
(10 points) Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.
9–10 points Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article.
8 points Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.
7 points Does not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.
0–6 points /10
Question 2
(10 points) Correctly identifies the research question implied in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.
9–10 points Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.
8 points Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.
7 points Does not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.
0–6 points /10
Question 3
(10 points) Correctly describes the design of the study that is described by the author or is implicit.
9–10 points Mostly describes the design of the study.
8 points Somewhat describes the design of the study.
7 points Does not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.
0–6 points /10
Question 4
(10 points) Correctly describes the characteristics of a qualitative study.
9–10 points Mostly describes the qualitative characteristics of the study.
8 points Somewhat describes the qualitative characteristics of the study.
7 points Does not describe the qualitative characteristics of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.
0–6 points /10
Question 5
(10 points) Correctly states peer review and editorial board status.
9–10 points Correctly states peer review status but fails to identify the editorial board status.
8 points Seems to know what peer review status is, but cannot seem to locate this for the article.
7 points Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands what is peer review or editorial board status.
0–6 points /10
Question 6
(10 points) Correctly describes any conflict of interest or financial gain.
9–10 points Describes one aspect of conflict of interest or financial gain.
8 points Claims there is a conflict where none exists.
7 points Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands the meaning of conflict of interest.
0–6 points /10
Question 7
(10 points) Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.
9–10 points Correctly identifies the population but provides only a general description.
8 points Correctly names the population but provides no description.
7 points Incorrectly identifies the population of the research article.
0–6 points /10
Question 8
(10 points) Correctly describes how the sample was selected. Gives the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling strategy.
9–10 points Correctly describes how the sample was selected, but identifies only one or two strengths and weaknesses of the sampling strategy.
8 points Correctly describes how the sample was selected, but incorrectly identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling strategy.
7 points Incorrectly describes how the sample was selected and/or provides no strengths and weaknesses of this sampling strategy.
0–6 points /10
Question 9
(10 points) Correctly identifies if subjects were vulnerable or at any risk, and describes how they were at risk.
9–10 points Correctly identifies if subjects were at risk, but only partially describes how they were at risk.
8 points Correctly identifies if subjects were at risk, but does not describe how they were at risk.
7 points Incorrectly describes if subjects were vulnerable or at any risk and/or does not describe how they were at risk.
0–6 points /10
Question 10
(10 points) Correctly identifies any HIPAA concerns in the study and fully explains them.
9–10 points Correctly identifies any HIPAA concerns in the study but only partially explains them.
8 points Correctly identifies any HIPAA concerns but does not explain them.
7 points Incorrectly identifies any HIPAA concerns in the study and/or incorrectly explains them.
0–6 points /10
Question 11
(10 points) Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.
9–10 points Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article.
8 points Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.
7 points Does not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.
0–6 points /10
Question 12
(10 points) Correctly identifies the research question implied in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.
9–10 points Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.
8 points Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.
7 points Does not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.
0–6 points /10
Question 13
(10 points) Correctly describes the design of the study that is described by the author or is implicit.
9–10 points Mostly describes the design of the study.
8 points Somewhat describes the design of the study.
7 points Does not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.
0–6 points /10
Question 14
(10 points) Correctly describes the characteristics of a quantitative study.
9–10 points Mostly describes the quantitative characteristics of the study.
8 points Somewhat describes the quantitative characteristics of the study.
7 points Does not describe the quantitative characteristics of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.
0–6 points /10
Question 15
(10 points) Correctly states peer review and editorial board status.
9–10 points Correctly states peer review status but fails to identify the editorial board status.
8 points Seems to know what peer review status is, but cannot seem to locate this for the article.
7 points Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands what is peer review or editorial board status.
0–6 points /10
Question 16
(10 points) Correctly describes any conflict of interest or financial gain.
9–10 points Describes one aspect of conflict of interest or financial gain.
8 points Claims there is a conflict where none exists.
7 points Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands the meaning of conflict of interest.
0–6 points /10
Question 17
(10 points) Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.
9–10 points Correctly identifies the population but provides only a general description.
8 points Correctly names the population but provides no description.
7 points Incorrectly identifies the population of the research article.
0–6 points /10
Question 18
(10 points) Correctly describes how the sample was selected. Gives the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling strategy.
9–10 points Correctly describes how the sample was selected, but identifies only one or two strengths and weaknesses of the sampling strategy.
8 points Correctly describes how the sample was selected, but incorrectly identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling strategy.
7 points Incorrectly describes how the sample was selected and/or provides no strengths and weaknesses of this sampling strategy.
0–6 points /10
Question 19
(10 points) Correctly identifies if subjects were vulnerable or at any risk, and describes how they were at risk.
9–10 points Correctly identifies if subjects were at risk, but only partially describes how they were at risk.
8 points Correctly identifies if subjects were at risk, but does not describe how they were at risk.
7 points Incorrectly describes if subjects were vulnerable or at any risk and/or does not describe how they were at risk.
0–6 points /10
Question 20
(10 points) Correctly identifies any HIPAA concerns in the study and fully explains them.
9–10 points Correctly identifies any HIPAA concerns in the study but only partially explains them.
8 points Correctly identifies any HIPAA concerns but does not explain them.
7 points Incorrectly identifies any HIPAA concerns in the study and/or incorrectly explains them.
0–6 points /10
Style and Writing
(25 pts) Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
23–25 points One to two errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.
21–22 points Three to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax
19–20 points Five or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.
0–18 points /25
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂