Using the National Center for Learning Disabilities (NCLD) case scenario provided, continue the scenario by describing the student progressing through the 10-step special education process required by IDEA 2004, using “The Basic Special Education Process under IDEA 2004” as a guide. Complete this assignment in 1000-1250-words.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
1
No Evidence
0.00%
2
Nominal Evidence
69.00%
3
Unacceptable Evidence
74.00%
4
Acceptable Evidence
87.00%
5
Target Evidence
100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
80.0 % Case Study Analysis
No submission.
Analysis is incomprehensible or unrelated to assignment.
Analysis is inadequate and not fully developed.
Analysis is clear and basic. Rationale is appropriate, but lacking detail. Applies 10 steps of the special education process within analysis, but with little support.
Thorough, realistic analysis of the case study provided with detailed rationale. Applies the 10 steps of the special education process comprehensively within analysis.
10.0 % Mechanics
No submission.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking.
Submission includes a few mechanical errors, but does not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures is used, as well as some practice and content-related language.
Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
10.0 % Organization
No submission.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. Argument is illogical. Conclusion does not support the claims made.
Purpose statement is vague and claims do not thoroughly support it. Argument and conclusion are orderly, but do not present convincing justification of claims.
Purpose statement and conclusion are clear. Argument shows logical progression. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion.
Purpose statement and related conclusion are clear and convincing. Information is well organized and logical. Argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner