Exam 3—Chaps 6-8 + Pizzi
In responding to these questions, you are expected to use (as appropriate) material and information from the textbooks, PowerPoints, and discussion board. Grades in the “A” range (indicating excellence) will be reserved for those responses that use material beyond that which everyone is expected to use. Specifically, material from other classes, other books, journal articles, media/entertainment reports, etc. that is correctly and appropriately incorporated into your answer will indicate efforts beyond the expected. Be sure to include in-text citations and a reference section (using APA) as the last page of your exam so I will know from where your supporting arguments and examples come.
To make sure I know what question you are answering, cut the questions from this document and paste it in your document above your answer. The number before the decimal indicates the chapter from which the question in drawn and the number after indicates the question from that chapter. So, 1.1 means chapter 1, question 1.
This exam is worth 100 points total, but notice that individual questions may have different values. The greater the point value, the more important it is for you to include material beyond the minimum expected.
6.1 Note the two dimensions of analysis used by Bayley to describe the structure of police systems then explain the six categories resulting from those dimensions. (20 points)
7.1 By American standards, French trial courts seem bound by few restrictions on the kind of evidence that can be introduced (e. g., prior convictions of the accused are admissible as relevant evidence). The textbook explained this apparent permissiveness by three factors. List and explain those factors. (15 points)
8.1 List, explain, and exemplify each of the justifications for punishment covered in the textbook. (20 points)
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!