natural environment in engineering

Engineers have often been accused of creating processes and artefacts that have a negative impact on the natural environment. Discuss the validity of this accusation with reference to your particular Engineering discipline, and suggest practical and sustainable ways to overcome such negative effects in the modern world. I would like to have an essay about the following attachment. my discipline is a chemical engineering. I would suggest to write for me something suit my field I would recommend to write for me about ”melamine”. also the essay must be between 950- 1050 words in single space ONLY. the citation must be from WEBSITE and no more than 4 references. and please could write down for me the URL because my professor is going to have a look on the website. this report is about a communication so I don’t want to have a much details.
Write an essay of 1,000 words (excluding references) based on the following title.
You must use the
template
provided on Moodle
. Make sure your Lecture Group number, name and student number are
entered in the header of the template.
Engineers have often b
een accused of creating processes and artefacts that have a negative impact on the
natural environment. Discuss the validity of this accusation with reference to your particular Engineering
discipline, and suggest practical and sustainable ways to overcome
such negative effects in the modern
world.
You need to submit a
hard copy of the essay
along with a
hard copy of the
T
urnitin
receipt
to
the school
office. Instructions for using T
urnitin have been previously provided and are on Moodle.
The essay should
be stapled in the top left hand corner
, with the T
urnitin
receipt
at
the back (Note, the staple
should be sufficiently far into the corner so that all the words on the page are readable).
DO NOT submit the
essay in any form of binder or plastic wallet.
C
onsideration will be given in the marking to the criteria described below. The criteria are not applied in a
mechanical manner, and that your mark will ultimately be the result of our academic judgment.
Excellent
First Class (70%+)
Very Good
Upper Secon
d (60
–
69%)
Good
Lower Second (50
–
59%)
Satisfactory
Third (40
–
49%)
Unsatisfactory
Fail (39% and below)
Coherence
Full and relevant
response to the
assignment set
Originality in approach
Very informative,
relevant and interesting
introduction
Very well
argued piece
of work, with main
points emerging clearly
Very effective
progression of argument
Very effective
conclusion, drawing
together the main points
of argument
Relevant response to the
assignment set
Some originality in
approach
Informative, releva
nt
and interesting
introduction
Well
–
argued, with main
points emerging clearly
Effective progression of
argument
Effective conclusion,
drawing together the
main points of argument
Some irrelevant
responses to the
assignment set
Little originality in
approach, predictable
content
Introduction may be
lacking in focus
Organization reasonably
clear but with some
limitations in respect of:
progression of
argument, use of
paragraphs, and
cohesive devices
Conclusion may not
draw arguments
together convincin
gly
A number of irrelevant
points or omissions in
relation to the
assignment set
Essentially predictable
content
Clumsy introduction
Not very clear
organization with many
limitations in respect of:
progression of
argument, use of
paragraphs and cohesive
d
evices
Generally unconvincing
conclusion
Considerable irrelevance
for the requirements of
the assignment
Insufficient information
conveyed
Banal content
No introduction, or
extremely poor
introduction
Organization extremely
difficult to follow with
many p
roblems
regarding progression of
argument
No conclusion, or
extremely poor
conclusion
Design and Practice, EUC_4_005
Communications Final Essay
Evidence
Excellent reference to
empirical and/or
experiential evidence
Excellent use of
references and
examples, soundly and
logically integrated in
the essay
Excellent and
appropriate
acknowledgement of
references and
examples, using the
Harvard referencing
system
Good reference to
empirical and /or
experiential evidence
Good use of references
and examples, soundly
and logically integrated
in the essay
Good a
nd appropriate
acknowledgement of
references and
examples, using the
Harvard referencing
system
Uneven research, the
results of which may not
always be well
integrated in the essay
Uneven reference to
empirical and /or
experiential evidence
Uneven use of
r
eferences and
examples, not always
logically integrated in
the essay
Overuse, awkward or
ineffective use of direct
quotations
Uneven
acknowledgement of
references and
examples, and correct
use of Harvard
referencing system
Little research if any,
with litt
le or no
integration in the piece
of work
Little reference to
empirical and/or
experiential evidence
Little use of references
and examples
References and
examples, when used,
incorrectly
acknowledged
Generally incorrect use
of Harvard reference
system
No e
vidence of research
No reference to
empirical and/or
experiential evidence
No reference to sources
or quotations within the
text
Complete inability to
follow Harvard
referencing system
regarding
acknowledgment of
sources
Analysis
Excellent analytical
qualities, demonstrated
at appropriate
intellectual level
Excellent balance
between description and
analysis and justification
Excellent depth of
inquiry, insight and
critical appraisal
Good analytical qualities
demonstrated at a
reas
onably demanding
intellectual level
Good balance between
description and analysis
and justification
Good depth of inquiry,
insight and critical
appraisal
Unremarkable analytical
qualities. Simple and not
always effective
argumentation
Uneven balance
betwe
en description and
analysis and justification
Uneven depth of inquiry,
insight and critical
appraisal
Limited evidence of
analytical qualities.
Coherent argument
generally lacking
Poor balance between
description, analysis and
justification
Poor depth of
inquiry,
insight and critical
appraisal
Lack of analytical
qualities
Lack of balance between
description, analysis and
justification
Lack of any depth of
inquiry, analysis or
critical appraisal
Presentation
Very confident use of
writing style appropriate
for the assignment set,
including tone and
register
Appropriate length
(complies with word
count)
Confident use of
paragraphs and cohesive
devices
Wide range of sentence
structures used
accurately and
effectively
Excellent command of
grammar
Wide range of
vocabulary
Excellent spelling and
punctuation
Reasonably confident
use of writing style for
the assignment,
including tone and
register, with only minor
slips
Appropriate length
(complies with word
count)
Confident use of
paragraphs and cohesive
devices
Good range of sentence
structures used
accurately and
effectively for the most
part
Good command of
grammar
Good range of
vocabulary
Good spelling and
punctuation
Suitable use of writing
style for the assignment,
including tone and
register
Appropr
iate length
(complies with word
count)
Use of paragraphs not
always appropriate
Sentence structures not
always accurate or
effective
Adequate command of
grammar, although
limited in range
Adequate use of
vocabulary, although
limited in range
Adequate spell
ing and
punctuation, although
there may be some slips
Insecure use of
academic style for the
assignment, including
tone and register
May not be well
presented in relation to
the assignment set
May not comply with
word count
Insecure use of
paragraphs
Lim
ited range of
sentence structures, not
always well mastered
Unsure command of
grammar
Limited mastery of
vocabulary
A number of spelling and
punctuation errors
Poorly presented in
relation to the
assignment set
May not comply with
word count
Inadequate u
se of
academic style for the
assignment, including
tone and register
Poor use of paragraphs,
and general lack of
cohesive devices.
Very limited range of
sentence structures
Very limited appropriate
use of grammar
Very limited range of
effectively used
voc
abulary
Poor spelling and
punctuation
Referencing
Reference to at least
four publications
Inclusion of such
references in the text
Correct listing of
references in Harvard
format at end of essay
Reference to at least
four publications
Competent Inclusion
of
such references in the
text
Correct listing of
references in Harvard
format at end of essay
Reference to four
publications
Generally correct
inclusion of such
references in text
Generally correct listing
of references in the
Harvard format at end of
ess
ay
Less than four
references used
Poor inclusion in of
references in text
Poor listing of
references in Harvard
format at end of essay
Insufficient number of
references
Very poor inclusion of
references in text
Absence or incorrect
listing of references
in
Harvard format at end of
essay