Personality and Neurocognitive Disorders
Each person is required to provide a minimum of two scholarly posts to graded discussion forums. In order to earn the higher score you must meet all of the criteria. If you do not meet all the required criteria then you will be given the score in which all the criteria is met. Posts must include in-text APA citations to support your discussions.
Note: comments like, “I agree with you” or “That’s a good idea” does not reflect critical thought and are not scholarly. By providing critical thought you will prevent your grade from being reduced.
A score of 4 is the highest score you can achieve. To earn 4 points both of your posts must integrate other meaningful scholarly material (cited appropriately) and will facilitate further discussion. Your posts are well written and demonstrate concepts learned with applications and examples. Overall pattern of posts exhibits that student’s optimal engagement with the discussion board throughout the week. A score of 3 is better than average work. At least one of the posts integrates other meaningful scholarly material (cited appropriately) and facilitates further discussion. Posts are well written and demonstrate concepts learned with applications and examples. Both posts also facilitate further discussion. Overall pattern of posts exhibits student is actively engaged in the discussions. A score of 2 is average work that reviews the concepts and your interpretations and does little if anything to further the dialogue in either post. Scholarly work is integrated into both postings and APA is appropriately applied. Pattern of posts do not exhibit active engagement. A score of 1 means that only one post was made or that one or both post(s) were below average. A score of 0 –
The paper must be from the following text book information:
Texts
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed. DSM-5®). Washington, DC: Author.
pp. 645-684
Personality Inventories for DSM 5 – Retrieved from: https://www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures#Cultural
Corcoran, J. & Walsh, J. (2010). Clinical assessment and diagnosis in social work practice. Oxford: University Press.
Chapter 13
Perry, B. D. & Szalavitz, M. (2006). The Boy who was raised as a dog: And other stories from a child psychiatrist’s notebook. Basic Books: Cambridge, M. A.
Chapter 10
Instructor Presentation
Week 8 – Personality Disorders
Article
Levy, K.N. (2005). The implications of attachment theory and research for understanding borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 959-986. DOI:10.10170S0954579405050455
Accessing Docutek Articles
Click on Docuteck access — https://ollu.docutek.com/eres/coursepass.aspx?cid=102
Password for this course is 7371
New Screen: Click on the Unit you are working on; immediately below will appear the documents available for that unit.
Click on the document you want.– article will open in new window
Media
Axelrod, S.R. (2011). Borderline Personality Disorder and its Challenges. (Lecture -48min)
Fruzzetti, A. (2012). The Essence of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy. (Lecture – 63 min)
Kaplan, C. (2012).Borderline personality and trauma: Implications for assessment and treatment.(Lecture – 26.32 min.)
What Borderline Personality Disorder feels like
No Tough Love with Borderline Personality Disorder by Tami Green