Martin distinguishes between the metaphysical and the epistemological notion of necessary truths. Present the two notions, the background theory against which they are proposed by Quine and Kripke, and defend one of the two, the best way you know. Do you agree with Martin on the terminology he uses to distinguish between the two approaches to necessary truths? More importantly, what implications do you think the view you defended has for a reply to skepticism, e.g., about our knowledge of the external world, or about knowledge of other minds?
Call Us: USA +1 862 207 3288