http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/37996/000095012405002241/k91501ddef14a.htm
this link is for the proxy statement of ford motors. you have to write 2 pages as described below. this is a 4 page paper i have attached the first 2
One approach
—Use your example/evidence and vote to support your overall view and thesis about whether firms should change their executive compensation practices
Second approach
—Summarize your argument and thesis for or against firms needing to change executive compensation
—Evaluate your example and evidence, and decide whether your initial thesis was correct/incorrect
—Revise thesis
Possible questions to consider for your argument
—How is executive compensation structured in this company?
—What has been the firm’s recent performance?
—Are shareholders justified in their claims and submitting the resolutions? Why or why not?
—Are there critiques from other stakeholders or the media? Are these other critiques justified?
What is the firm’s rationale for its compensation and for shareholder advice on the vote? Is this justified?
—How are different stakeholders of the firms effected by its executive compensation practices?
—Who is on the board of directors? The compensation committee? Are there any possible conflicts of interest?
—Did the example cause you to reconsider your initial thinking? Does it shed new light on your thesis?
What are the implications of your analysis for policy, stakeholders, and society more generally?
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!