Sociological Theory, continued: Weber, Foucault and Bourdieu

write a 2-3 page (double spaced 12 pt. Times New Roman or Cambria font) response to attched files. It should be both a critical

response and reflection on the readings.

1. ARGUMENT. What is the author’s central argument?

2. EVIDENCE. What do you consider to be the readings’ most compelling evidence mobilized in support of their argument?

Explain how that evidence works to support the analysis.

3. SURPRISE. Identify something that surprised you or challenged a priori understandings that you had, something that you

would have found hard to believe. In other words, WHY are you surprised?

4. CONFIRM. Something that confirms what you already know. (i.e. something that doesn’t surprise you at all.)

5. CURIOUS. Identify or discuss something that you would like to know more about. You might mention one or more cited

sources.

6. HELP. A Term or phrase/concept perhaps a theoretical argument that you find helpful/inspiring. It helped you to better

understand the analysis presented.

7. CONFUSE. Something that you don’t understand: this could be a term, an idea, an argument, a passage (feel free to list

a page or paragraph that you don’t’ understand).

http://www.acemyhomework.com/download.php?f=1465866814.pdf
http://www.acemyhomework.com/download.php?f=99301905.pdf

TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!

READ ALSO :   saving in aircraft maintenance cost