Sustainable Management Futures

Sustainable Management Futures

Read  the  below extract by Erika Watson taken from the “The Guardian” (18 March 2012)
“Quotas aren’t the best way to get more women into boardrooms”
…A  gender-equality  policy  that  focuses  on  women  at  the  top  is  unsustainable  when  most
women’s prospects are shrinking. The European justice commissioner is proposing mandatory
quotas for women in boardrooms if voluntary measures fail. Few people disagree these days
with the need for more women at the top of business and banking. Three-quarters of people
across Europe say they are in favour of laws to ensure gender balanced boards. And perhaps
buoyed  by  those  findings,  the  European  justice  commissioner,  Viviane  Redding,  is  proposing
mandatory  quotas  if  a  voluntary  approach  doesn’t  speed  up.  In  the  UK  this  is  set  against  a
context of women losing jobs at a higher rate than men, and over 2 million low- to middle-income  families  facing  tax  credit  cuts  in  this  week’s  budget.  Strange  times  indeed:  when
affirmative  action  is  on  the  cards  for  those  at  the  top,  while  equality  is  reined  back  for
everyone else.
Nevertheless,  there  are  very  good  reasons  for  introducing  boardroom  gender  quotas.  There
are stacks of research that confirm that gender diversity on boards results in better corporate
performance on every measure, including finance. And there’s widespread agreement too that
male-dominated  cultures  in  the  top  echelons  of  banking  and  business  created  ghettos  of
groupthink and excessive risk taking. Those narrow cultures were at the heart of what went
wrong  in  the  global  financial  crisis. The  Swedish  prime  minister  recently  said:  “A  male
atmosphere creates more risk and a greater risk of corruption.”
Quotas have gradually increased female representation on boards  in Norway from 9% in 2003
to  over  40%  today. And  similar  approaches  are  now  being  rolled  out  in  other  European
countries,  including  Belgium,  France,  Italy,  the  Netherlands  and  Spain.  The  issue  is  being
seriously  debated  in  Germany.  Legislation  varies,  but  there’s  a  broadly  common  model  of
gradually  increasing  targets,  from  20%  up  to  40%.  Corporate  Britain,  fairly  united  against
quotas, has heaved a sigh of relief this week. Voluntary efforts in the last year have resulted
in  a  new record  high  for  female  representation  on  the  boards  of  the  UK’s  100  largest  listed
companies.  The proportion has gone up from 12.5% last year to 15.6% this year.  Experts say
that at that level of momentum, we could reach 30% in four years. We’ll see. If the increase is
not  maintained,  then,  as  David  Cameron  said  recently,  the  case  for  quotas  may  be
unavoidable.
But while corporate Britain has pulled out the stops to get female non-executive directors on
to its boards, the proportion of women executive directors (female employees who sit on the
board) has crawled along from just 5.5% to 6.6%. Promotion prospects come at just the time
women start to have families. With expensive childcare, and few meaningful family-friendly
workplaces,  few of  those  talented  women  last  long  enough  to  make  it  to  the top.  If  quotas
are  to  work  in  the  UK,  we  may  need  to  borrow  Norway’s  childcare  system  as  well.  As  it  is,
childcare  tax  credits  are  being  cut  for  around  500,000  families  in  a  few  weeks.  And  quotas
won’t work if they reflect and reinforce the growing chasm between top and bottom earners
in the UK today. The pay gap between the highest and lowest earners has reached an all-time
high.  In  the  last  year  the  pay  of  the  lowest  earners  stood  still  or  dropped,  while  the pay
of directors and chief executives increased by 15%. It may be impossible to justify a gender-equality  policy  that  focuses  on  women  at  the  top  at  the  same  time  as  the  position  and
prospects of most working women are shrinking. If we’re to change the culture on corporate
boards,  quotas  may  be  the  worst  option  we  have,  except  for  all  the  others. But  even  then,
they  need  to  go  hand-in-hand  with  policies  that  support  equal  opportunities  at  work,  at  all
levels.
Task
Using  the  findings  and  recommendations  of  the  Lord  Davies  Report  argue  the  case  for
affirmative action to introduce more women into the boardroom. Propose an action  plan
for business to follow in order to encourage women to break through the glass ceiling.

READ ALSO :   analysis event

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂