article review 3 – Organizational learning and development

Agree or disagree with the article
Introduction
The approach of the twenty first century has bought the recognition of how much value knowledge has in organizations, as being most strategic

and an important source for sustaining competitive advantage and high organizational performance, (Prieto and Revilla, 2004; Schwaer et

al.,2012). As global markets are on continuous changes, organizations’ success is measured on how much information and knowledge it has than its

competitors, therefore the input of innovation and knowledge management has direct positive effect on the organizations’ performance.
How Knowledge is effectively managed and contributes to create value?
The input of knowledge Management in introducing competitiveness and performance improvement is very much acknowledged, yet the process of how

knowledge is implemented and shared is to be researched, (Holsapple and Singh, 2001; Shahzad et al., 2013). Therefore organizations had invested

on systems and processes supported by advanced technologies to create and circulate knowledge, (Yuetal. 2004). There are many factors which

organizations require to consider prior to implement the knowledge strategy, one of them is the consideration of complex nature of knowledge as

difficulties may occur not on the explicit of knowledge but the knowledge tacit. Organizations follows various approaches in tacit knowledge

internally,
1. Transferring knowledge into explicit format, through documentation, process and database designs.
2. Developing the tacit knowledge through human interaction, with the human capital “resources” element in designing learning and

development plans, Personal and career development plans, Rewards schemes and strong HRM.
The positive inputs of knowledge in organization has the favourable impact on various sectors,
A. Knowledge in Products and Services: Organizations prior to introducing new products and services; heavily invest on market researches to

READ ALSO :   How Procedural Justice influences Affective Commitment?

understand customers’ preference and market demands.
B. Knowledge in People: Workforce which is the most valuable among the organizations assets, converting the individual knowledge into

organizational through learning programmes which motivate personal development.
C. Knowledge in Customers: Customers’ satisfaction is a strategic benefit for organizational knowledge, through creating strong

clients/customers relationship management to have a deep understanding of what customer’s desire, wish and prefer. That would assist

organizations in improving its products and services.
D. Knowledge in Process: Organization might have the same level of knowledge however applied differently as every process has an embedded

knowledge which elaborate and expresses the experience, personal knowledge and skills of the individuals who designs the process.
E. Knowledge in Relationships: Helps in widening the scope of relationships in sharing knowledge and having depth understanding, improve

the flow and circulation of knowledge and builds new connections.
Taking examples of companies applied the knowledge in people, is the Dutch oil services giant, SHELL. Where the organization encouraged the

empowerment and teamwork as it utilized the intellectual capital, developed regional excellence centres for personal development, knowledge

communities and developing skills, building online educational platforms for staff. These knowledge initiatives had helped in removing the

hierarchical and formal steps of communication.

Processes and Systems supports knowledge
The objective knowledge systems and process, builds an integrated and planned channels to develop and ease the access of knowledge,

(Firestone,2001). As it is important and related to individual and organizational performance; it should be exposed to teams, groups and

everyone within the organization. Social media for instance, had been proven lately it’s direct influence on knowledge sharing and processes

READ ALSO :   Jeffersonians vs Hamiltonians.

within organizations, (Chow and Chan, 2008). Referring to Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) as identifiers to the SECI Model as it adopts four stages

for sharing knowledge which are socialization, externalisation, Combination and Internalisation. These such models assist in the share of

knowledge with people to formulate new ideas and concepts where it becomes explicit knowledge.

Reference
Shahzad, K, Bajwa, S, Siddiqi, A, Ahmid, F, & Raza Sultani, A.(2016), ‘Integrating knowledge management (KM) strategies and processes to enhance

organizational creativity and performance: An empirical investigation’, Journal Of Modelling In Management, 11, 1, p. 154-179, Scopus®,

EBSCOhost, viewed 26 March 2016
Al-Hakim, L, & Hassan, S.(2016), ‘Core requirements of knowledge management implementation, innovation and organizational performance’, Journal

Of Business Economics And Management, 17, 1, p. 109-124, Scopus®, EBSCOhost, viewed 26 March 2016.
Dierkes, M. Berthoin, A. Child, J. & Nonaka, I. eds. (2003) Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!