Make a case for reform of Australia’s system of federalism argue a case from the perspective of urban
Order Description
present a report on the options available for reforming the Australian system of federalism
Make a case for reform of Australia’s system of federalism argue a case from the perspective of urban reform
You must take care not to simply produce a partisan case for a
particular group; a well- considered reform recommendation
must resist partisanship in favour of critical appraisal
of all perspectives. Thus, while you will argue in favour of a
particular view, you must do so on the basis of a critical
assessment of opposing views.
Prepare a fully referenced report on reform of intergovernmental relations as
explained below.
Submit the report online in CloudDeakin. Please check for plagiarism
through Turn -it -in before submitting the final version of the assignment .
You can technically submit more than one version – the most recent will
be assessed.
Use a version of the Harvard (author-year) citation system . Have a style
guide at hand when finalising the assignment. Do not assume that you will
get the referencing right on the basis of academic experience. For
formatting of the report, please consult Report writing at
http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/study-support/academic -resources/report -writing
MAKE A CASE FOR REFORM OF AUSTRALIA’S SYSTEM OF FEDERALISM
On the basis of the debates examined in this unit , present a report on the options
available for reform ing the Australian system of federalism. In doing so, make a
case for the option that you wou ld recommend.
You may argue your case from the perspective of one of the groups considered in
this u nit (such as rural, coastal or urban).
Alternatively, you may approach the question from a theoretical point of view
such as the implications of globalisation for intergovernmental relations, or the
possibilities and limits for reform emanating from the notions of
constitutiona lism, sovereignty and democracy. Under this approach, your case
would be for limiting reforms in accordance with the possibilities and limits you
identify.
Whichever of these alternatives you adopt, your project must be based on the
relevant literature, not just on your own ideas. Your appraisal of that literature
must of course be critical, but the proposal must give it serious consideration.
You must take care not to simply produce a partisan case for a particular group;
a well -considered reform recommendation must resist partisanship in favour of
critical appraisal of all perspectives. Thus, while you will argue in favour of a
particular view, you must do so on the basis of a critical assessment of opposing
views.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂