INTRODUCTION
CHOSEN SKILL … WOUND CARE (E.G FUNGATIVE SARCOMA WOUND)…. Introduce the topic as written in the assignment outcome
2. state the importance of learning through reflection
3. Use Gibbs , explain why chose Gibbs, state reason and its relevance to this assignment.
4.Describe your previous knowledge about wound dressing in the simulation lab in the university
* talk about hand hygiene in simulation
*performing wound care on colleagues and manikin
*compare ANTT technique on patient with manikin
* state importance of Aseptic non touch techniques techniques
*Also include your previous knowledge , thoughts, and skills about wound dressing.
5. Analyse the application of your skill in the practice environment. How did simulation in the skills labs enhance your preparation
6. Discuss your feelings in the actual acts as you go through the process .
7. Discuss how the experience will contribute to your ongoing and future development
* how you self reflected
*comments from patients
*feedback from mentor
8. Use current evidences for the assignment i.e books, journals, peer review, internet sources.
9. Use theoreticals skills from UK based papers and guidelines i.e NICE and NMC to design the description of how the skills was taught
theoretically in skills lab and how it is been done in practices.
10. Assignment should focus more on your reflection and examination of your learning development through both simulation and actual experience
rather than technical evaluation of the particular skills.
11.Please use theoretical skills from UK based papers and guidelines i.e NICE and NMC to design the description of how the skills was thought
theoretically in the skills lab then add how it is been done in practice/ placement to the patient. Please use UK based literature.
12.Using current evidences reflect upon how your understanding has developed and how you have transferred this into your practice during this
first placement. The emphasis of this assignment should focus on your reflection and examination of your learning development through both
simulation and actual experience rather than be a technical evaluation of the particular skill- please look at the learning activity from
simulation ( different ways of teaching styles, role play, videoing, peer/self-reflection, theory, SDL) and feedback. In practice, how did you
learn- real patient, mentor, supervision, feedback and self-reflection and others.
13.You must employ a recognised reflective model to guide your reflection and structure your work. Guide your reader in how you apply the chosen
reflective model in your essay. Please include a copy of your chosen reflection model in your appendix. Explore your rationale of choosing this
model and define what reflection is?
14. Demonstrate a deep knowledge and understanding which underpins safe care in reflective practice
15. Engage confidently in academic and professional communication reporting on action clearly, autonomously and competently in order to deliver
patient individualised care
16.Integrate knowledge; understand professional values and skills as required in the NMC code (2015) to complete the practice assessment
documents in the practice setting.
17.You must employ a recognised reflective model to guide your reflection and structure your work. Please include a copy of your chosen
reflection model in your appendix. Please refer to PowerPoint presentation on reflection model under assignment folder for further information
18.Your reflection must consist of the following four elements:
• Analyse your previous knowledge, thoughts and feelings of your initial preparations for the skill identify.
• The impact of simulation in the Skills lab upon your preparation
• Your application of the skill in the practice environment.
You should also discuss how this experience will contribute to your ongoing and future
1. Introduction, Main content and Overall Conclusion- no subheading
2. Layout – Arial, Font size 12, Double spacing, Justify,
3. Read the confidentially policy, extension policy and mitigation policy
4. Reference list
5. Appendix
GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Society & Health: LEVEL 7
A
(85-100%) (70%-84%) B
(60-69%) C
(50-59%) D
(40-49%) E
(34-39%) F
(33% – 0%)
Level 7 Criteria >8.5 7-8.4 6-6.9 5-5.9 4-4.9 3.4-3.9 <3.4
1. Presentation
10
All work should be presented to a high level. Work must be appropriately structured and demonstrate fluent articulation and clarity of
expression. Spelling and grammar must be correct
Within the word limit
Word count declared All work should be presented to a high level. Work must be appropriately structured and demonstrate fluent articulation and
clarity of expression. Spelling and grammar must be correct
Within the word limit
Word count declared Demonstrates exceptional academic writing style for this level of work Work is clearly presented and grammatically correct
with no spelling errors
Demonstrates fluent articulation and clarity of expression
Within the word limit
Word count declared Work is clearly presented, fluent and grammatically correct
Thoughts and ideas are clearly expressed
Within the word limit
Word count declared Work is clearly presented. Minimal errors in grammar and spelling
Thoughts and ideas are clearly expressed
Within the word limit
Word count declared Some inconsistencies in the standard of presentation.
Minimal errors in grammar and spelling.
Meaning apparent but not always clearly expressed
Within the word limit
Word count declared Work is poorly presented and/or marred by errors affecting comprehensibility
Inadequate proof reading. Length not within required limits
Word count declared
>12.7 12.6-10.5 9-10.4 7.5-8.9 6-7.4 5.1-5.9 <5.1
2. References
15
The Harvard system must be used consistently and accurately throughout the work.
It is expected that students will demonstrate a range of reading appropriate to the topic and the academic level. Although difficult to
prescribe, it is anticipated that students will draw on a range of literature, and other forms of evidence, using this to extend perspectives
and elaborate on current thinking. The Harvard system must be used consistently and accurately throughout the work.
It is expected that students will demonstrate a range of reading appropriate to the topic and the academic level. Although difficult to
prescribe, it is anticipated that students will draw on a range of literature, and other forms of evidence, using this to extend perspectives
and elaborate on current thinking. Able to extrapolate from a diverse range of evidence. Harvard System used consistently and accurately.
Wide range of reading evident and utilised appropriately throughout the work. Harvard System used consistently and accurately.
Wide range of reading evident and utilised appropriately for the majority of the work. Harvard System used consistently and accurately in the
majority of the work. Some evidence of wide reading within the work. Harvard System used with minimal errors in referencing evident.
Some evidence of wide reading to support parts of the discussion.
Harvard System used but referencing incomplete and multiple errors evident. References not always utilised appropriately to support the work.
Limited evidence of wide reading to support discussion.
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!