Does the ‘deliberative turn’ in democratic theory mean that the failures of modern democratic institutions can be resolved?
This is a detailed research essay with a limit of 3000 words. Answer the question taking into account theories of deliberative democracy, it’s shortcomings, difference democracy, and inequalities in democracy. Stay on topic. Incorporate empirical evidence if possible. Need to use 10 sources, can use outside of those listed but please use reputable journals etc. Introduction; interpret question well. Avoid description, make argument tackle question expressley. Please read use and incorporate the following sources but come up with your own opinion for the answer to the question:
*† Dryzek, J. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations
Oxford: OUP
†Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J. (Eds.) (2012) Deliberative Systems (Theories of Institutional Design)
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
† Parkinson, J. (2006) Deliberating in the real world
Oxford: OUP
Chambers, S. (2003) Deliberative Democratic Theory
Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 6, pp. 307-326
† Goodin, R. (2008) Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn (esp. Introduction)
Oxford: OUP
† Hardin, R. (2009) Deliberative Democracy, in Christiano, T. and Christman, J. (Eds.) Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy
Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
Also Ch. 14 by Joshua Cohen, J. in the same volume is very useful
Neblo, M. (2007) Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring Deliberation
Swiss Political Science Review 13 (4): 527-557
Inequality
*†Birch, A. (2007) The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy (Ch. 14)
London: Taylor and Francis
Norris, P. (2011) Democratic Deficit (Ch. 2)
Cambridge, CUP
Solt, F.(2008) Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement
American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 48-60
Brady, H. Verba, S. and Schlozman, K. L. (1995) Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation
American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 271-294
†Fraser, N. (2013) Scales of Justice Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (Ch. 2)
Hoboken: Wiley
†Estlund, D. (2009) Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework (esp. Ch. 1)
Princeton: PUP
Deliberative problems
*†Dryzek, J. (2002) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (esp. Ch. 2)
Oxford: OUP
* Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. (2002) Deliberation Day
Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 10. No. 2, pp. 129-152
Ryfe, D. (2005) Does Deliberative Democracy Work?
Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 49-71
Cooke, M. (2012) Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy
Political Studies, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 947-969
Chambers, S. (2003) Deliberative Democratic Theory
Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 6, pp. 307-326
Goodin, R. (2012) How can deliberative democracy get a grip?
The Political Quarterly, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 806-811
Karpowitz, C., Mendelberg, T. and Shaker, L. (2012) Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation
American Political Science Review, Vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 533-547
Pennington, M. (2010) Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit
Critical Review, 22 (2-3) pp. 159-184
Difference Democracy
*†Young, I. M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy (esp. Ch 1)
Oxford: OUP
Tebble, A. (2002) What is the politics of difference?
Political Theory, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 259-281
Young, I. M. (2002) Reply to Tebble
Political Theory, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 282-288
Wolin, S. (1993) Democracy, Difference, and Re-cognition
Political Theory Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 464-483
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!